Grubby fingers on the scales

For those not normally exercised by the parochial freak show that is Australian politics, “the Morrison government” is a coalition of two parties that pitch themselves as being on the side of free markets and smaller government.

Obviously, as they say in Tasmania, “it’s all relative”.

The Greens are, well, what Greens are the world over; water melons.

The Greens are willing to help the Morrison government pass contentious new laws to make global digital tech giants pay local news media companies for content, but its Senate support will be contingent on the inclusion of both public broadcasters in the mandatory industry code.
Under the proposed laws foreign technology platforms such as Google and Facebook would be forced to pay news companies for use of their articles, share key data and warn them of any changes to their algorithms or face fines of up to 10 per cent of local revenue.

Prima facie, these are curious bedfellows.

Some understanding of the nature of Australian politics is required to make sense of this.

First though, read this sentence and see whether it makes any sense to you:

“There is no reason for the ABC and SBS to be excluded … public broadcasters deserve a fair return for what they produce and what the tech platforms benefit from. If the aim of this code is to ensure the viability of Australia’s media, then the government should ensure ABC is included, that AAP doesn’t fail and that small and independent publishers don’t miss out.”

For the benefit of our overseas readers, the ABC and SBS are government broadcasters. The concept that a government department “deserves” revenue from its competitors in the private sector tells you everything you need to know about Senator Hanson-Young’s understanding of commerce, economics or, indeed, the correct limitations of government.

Obviously, that we’re even talking about taxing one company to pay a competing government department is ridiculous, but the conversation started without anyone challenging the idea of taxing a company to pay for the failings of another.

Why are Facebook, Google, et al going to be clobbered with this potential tax? Because the local Australian media haven’t managed to get a viable subscription service in place to replace their century old paper-based revenue stream.

Did the Pony Express receive tax subsidies from the telegraph once the lines were laid?

Bill’s Opinion

Three things can be correct at the same time; the Australian political landscape can be populated by bedwetting collectivists and crony capitalists, the Australia legacy media can be incompetent and venal AND the big tech companies can be run by utter cunts.

Witness today’s auto-fill suggestions:

And yet:

3 Replies to “Grubby fingers on the scales”

  1. Re the postscript, it’s all a stratagem to get America’s first black woman president. I give it three months before Joe is wheeled off into retirement wearing an adult diaper.

    When Barry was elected in 2008, we hoped that he was going to turn his attention to Africa and end our chronic misery. But instead of bombing the shit out of Mugabe he bombed the shit out of Gadaffi, why, because Gadaffi had oil and Moggy Bob didn’t. Also the Arab League couldn’t give give a toss about Bob.

    Perhaps Kamala will do something, even if it is only to throw a few billions at our glorious leaders to fill up their Swiss pension plans.

  2. I thought the outcome was that Big Tech had just said “we don’t need (and therefore won’t allow) links to your media.” This would then deprive the Aus media of a couple of dozen clicks per day and inconvenience actual humans not one whit. Has that changed? Have I missed something? The other response would be to decamp altogether and leave the Lucky Country to fill its boots with Alibaba and Weibo.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.