It’s not the winning that counts

…but the taking part.

Lucky old Tom Decent; he was finally allowed to write about rugby yesterday, rather than being sent to the Folaus’ church to live blog from the Sunday service;

The good news for those who like the rugby status quo is that the Wallabies performed badly, lost a match and the coach and local commentators blamed a single decision by the referee.

Australia had just been awarded a scrum feed but right as the whistle blew Tupou belted South African back-rower Rynhardt Elstadt with a forceful hit. The TMO said he believed it was “clearly a shoulder charge to the chest”, while Williams said on the field: “The guy is sitting there and he’s come running in with the shoulder. It’s clearly dangerous, it hit him in the chest after the whistle. Away you go.”

Many thought a penalty would suffice but Australia were reduced to 14 men and it proved to be a pivotal moment in the game as South Africa ran away with the result to continue an eight-year winning streak on home soil against the Aussies.

Many thought” is doing a lot of work in those paragraphs above.

Many also thought it was fairly unintelligent to steam in to a ruck, shoulder first, in a stadium with more cameras than the Celebrity Big Brother House, particularly when the referee was playing advantage to your team.

A word to young aspiring sports journalists the world over; quoting Phil Kearns’ opinion on anything as if objective and knowledgeable is not conducive to being taken seriously. For example, the words “double movement” are nowhere to be found in the Rugby law book. Oh, and they are laws not rules, Phil.

Yeah, yeah, details are annoying.

Bill’s Opinion

It might be argued that Rugby Union is a dying sport in Australia. Certainly, the attendance figures for the top league are insipid and declining year on year.

Pinpointing when the rot set in is a tough task; the national team have had a reputation for over-performing for years compared to their perceived abilities and talent pool, which may have had an effect of disguising institutional problems.

Rather like Hemingway’s quote on how an individual became bankrupt, (“two ways…gradually and then suddenly“), one suspects the Australian rugby code is now reaping the poor harvest of inaction or actions of perhaps decades ago. My suspicion is the 2nd term of former CEO John O’Neil (2007-2013) might be a good starting point for an investigation and also the subsequent term of Bill Pulver.

Both were great examples of the the strange phenomenon of Australian upper class elite in a country that prides itself on being egalitarian and classless. O’Neil and Pulver attended St Joseph’s and “Shore” (Sydney Church of England Grammar School), respectively, as did most of their predecessors and peers. It’s a shallow and parochial talent pool which often benefits from the “closed shop” approach common to an “old boy’s network”.

Without forensically examining the board papers and internal memoranda throughout that period, it’s impossible to be certain what the causes of the malaise were. The consequences are plain to see though; declining attendance, participation and on-pitch results (there are people who are taking their driving lessons this year who weren’t born when Australia last won the Bledisloe Cup, for example).

Bill Pulver handed the reigns over to Raelene Castle who, although making encouraging noises about grassroots participation, has picked an ideological battleground which risks a heavy financial loss if unsuccessful, one which the sport can ill-afford at this febrile time.

There’s a glimmer of hope in the article linked above though; the semi-professional Shute Shield competition can draw crowds close to those of some of the Super Series teams.

Perhaps that’s the future of rugby in Australia; a recognition of financial reality and a reversion to the model where the athletes have regular jobs on civvie street and play for the love and prestige of the game?

Strangely, that might simultaneously save the sport and satisfy the Shore/Joeys alumni’s unspoken preference for the game to return to its “boutique” and exclusive roots; a visit to a top level rugby match in Sydney has the feel of an excuse for an old school social event rather than an outing for true sports fans.

6 Replies to “It’s not the winning that counts”

  1. Worse still they got beaten by a Saffa team whose performance level is limited by the requirements of black empowerment.

    I think the Aussie RU association with some type of higher class is definitely there and that it is directly related to the attitudes of the poms that established it down under. Just as League is as well. The private school boys that shine at union could in theory assume a career in amateur union as their daddy is quite often minted, whereas the state school union hopefuls would have to fit in with a 40 hr week job, paying the rent and the available bus timetables for interstate games.

    New Australians tend to overcompensate on their roots, in this case its the glorification of the public (private) school boy down south aristocratic wealthy type origins of the game. An older neighbor of mine summed it up nicely when we were having a few at the local union club bar, the club used to be league when the area was an inner city rough as guts wharfy suburb. He said the main difference was that in those days they came in utes now it is in SUV’s.

    One of the blokes that came in to replace me at my old firm was one of those private school boy types, banging on about reunions, wearing the tie and all that shite, he was a bit of a union boy as well.

    I done my old boss a favour today and drafted his termination letter, he just got it about an hour ago. Looks like he will need to downgrade to a ute and take his young sons to league trials when they are old enough. Just another looming talent problem for the Wallabies in the making.

    1. “New Australians tend to overcompensate on their roots, in this case its the glorification of the public (private) school boy down south aristocratic wealthy type origins of the game. “

      Yeah, I’m not convinced by your wealth of knowledge on this. I suspect I spend many more hours a month than you at rugby venues and with rugby folk.

      My experience is the class divide in rugby is far more prevalent in Australia than other countries. The irony makes me chuckle every time I witness it.

      1. The class divide being far more prevalent here, is the Aussie over compensation, we are in violent agreement.

          1. My mum quite often attends formal British functions when she is out here and reckons that the local pomp and ceremony is way overkill in comparison to the equivalent in Mud Island.

            On the Wallabies customer demand, it is that bad now that I knocked back an invite to a corporate box at Suncorp for the Argentina game on Saturday.

            Its all about the Lions these days.

          2. “… the local pomp and ceremony is way overkill”.

            I wonder if that’s not just a British ex-pats thing? I know Indians and South Africans, for example, who are far more patriotic away from home than I’d ever expect them to be in the old country.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.